United States Of Americ World Health Organization

United States of America Faith Renteria LHHSMUN World Health Organization Multidrug-Resistant Diseases; Cloning I. Country Profile A. Government 1. Official Country Name: United States of America 2. Governmental System: Constitution-based Federal Republic 3. Head of State: Barack Obama 4. Official Language(s): No Official Language 5. Region: Allies/Blocs: EU Members, NATO Members, Western Bloc B. People 1. Population and Growth Rate: 318,892,103, 0.77% 2. Major Religions/Cultures: Protestant, Roman Catholic, Mormon, Jewish; White, Black, Latino, Asian. C. Economy 1. Economic System: Industrialized Economy based on†¦show more content†¦D. Development 1. Development Statues: Industrial nation; developed 2. Climate: Mostly temperate, regions of Arctic in Alaska and Tropical in Hawaii 3. Environmental: Air and Water Pollution, Carbon Emissions E. Military 1. Military Organization 2. Military Expenditures: 4.35% of GDP 3. Major Weapons, Arsenal, Nuclear Capability etc.: Strong military defense weapons, Nuclear development F. Conflicts/ Issues 1. What are four problems/ threats that affect this nation?: Economic development since since the 2008 economic crash, Immigration, Race relations, Environmental issues from pollution. 2. Ethnic/ Cultural issues: Prejudices as a result of immigration, Islamaphobia, tension between the black community and white community 3. Refugee Problems: large amount of refugees from Iraq and Burma 4. Major conflict both past and present: Domestic security with immigration, largest consumer of cocaine from Columbia G. United Nations 1. Date admitted to the UN: 24 October 1945 2. Has the UN ever intervened in a conflict involving this nation? If so, where and how? No. 3. How does the country contribute to UN peacekeeping? US offers troops and economic aid to the UN peacekeeping efforts. 4. Has the UN cited this nation for human rights violations? If so, why? Cited by

Corporate America And The Corruption Within The Hip Hop...

Corporate America and the Corruption within the Hip-Hop Culture Being one of the more controversial lifestyles, the hip-hop culture has overcome many obstacles in the years to gain the respect it currently holds today. Indeed, there is still much controversy that lingers around the people within the movement, but â€Å"when untainted by outside influences and corporate vultures, hip-hop in its purest form is about empowerment, unity, culture, creativity, and hope† (Elkouby). The negative notions that regard the hip-hop culture can be attributed to corporate America and its failure to properly monitor radio play, its lack of trust within the record labels, and its greedy head honchos that build up artists only to see them fall in order to pocket the money for themselves. A crucial element in the success of many artists is the amount of radio play they receive. Obtaining playtime has never been easy, and just like many other things that are difficult to obtain, a black market has developed in order for artists to receive radio play. â€Å"Payola, in the music industry, is the illegal practice of payment or other inducement by record companies for the broadcast of recordings on commercial radio in which the song is presented as being part of the normal day’s broadcast† and not the day’s sponsored broadcast (â€Å"Payola†). Artists benefit from their songs being played on the radio because their songs can be heard by millions of others, which will in turn build their fan base. There is only soShow MoreRelatedRap Music And Its Effects On America1649 Words   |  7 PagesRap was originally created as a means of self-expression, while conveying present conditions within marginalized African American communities. Attaining global awareness in America, rap music emerged as one of the most controversial genres America has seen, influencing both white and black culture. Birthed in the mid- 1970’s rap music came to fruition in the Southern Bronx area of New York City. As rap culture began to emerge and grow in New York, rappers began to utilize their voice and voice theirRead MoreMonsanto: Better Living Through Genetic Engineering96204 Words   |  385 Pageseffective case analysis: The full story Hearing with the aid of implanted technology: The case of Cochlearâ„ ¢ – an Australian C A S E O N E high-technology leader Delta Faucet: Global entrepreneurship in an emerging market C A S E T W O DaimlerChrysler: Corporate governance dynamics in a gl obal company C A S E T H R E E Gunns and the greens: Governance issues in Tasmania C A S E F O U R Succeeding in the Sydney indie music industry C A S E F I V E Nucor in 2005 C A S E S I X News Corp in 2005: ConsolidatingRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesITC New Baskerville Std Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook appear on the appropriate page within text. Copyright  © 2013, 2011, 2009, 2007, 2005 by Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. This publication is protected by Copyright, and permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval systemRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 Pagessuccesses/Robert F. Hartley. —11th ed. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-470-16981-0 (pbk.) 1. Marketing—United States—Case studies. I. Title. HF5415.1.H37 2009 658.800973—dc22 2008040282 ISBN-13 978-0-470-16981-0 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PREFACE Welcome to the 30th anniversary of Marketing Mistakes and Successes with this 11th edition. Who would have thought that interest in mistakes would be so enduring? Many of you are pastRead More_x000C_Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis355457 Words   |  1422 Pagespermission to use material from this text or product, submit a request online at http://www.thomsonrights.com. Any additional questions about permissions can be submitted by e-mail to thomsonrights@thomson.com. Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 10 09 08 07 ExamView  ® and ExamView Pro  ® are registered trademarks of FSCreations, Inc. Windows is a registered trademark of the Microsoft Corporation used herein under license. Macintosh and Power Macintosh are registered trademarksRead MoreIgbo Dictionary129408 Words   |  518 Pagesenormously since the first edition of this dictionary, and the standardization and development of the language have also progressed under the leadership of a group of dedicated linguists and the enthusiasts of the Society for Promoting Igbo language and Culture. A dictionary of Standard Igbo is now seriously needed; it is hoped that the present work will be one of the sources for such a dictionary. The complete text was revised in 1976-77 with the assistance of Mr Alphonsus A. Ndife, then a student at the

Multilevel Organizational Communications †Free Sample to Students

Question: Discuss about the Multilevel Organizational Communications. Answer: Introduction In a system where unemployment is rife, finding a good job is a challenge. Using a strategy that would make things happen for me, I started scheming on how to create my own job. I looked at some of my friends making it business and realized that entrepreneurship was the key to success. However, how would I get started without capital? After reading some business books and success stories, I opted to sell ideas to struggling brands using my problem solving skills. I wrote tens of emails to various organizations with suggestions of what I had to offer. After months of waiting and follow up questions, nothing happened. Although the messages that I sent reached their respective receivers, they did not have the expected outcome. My goal was to seal a business deal but this did not happen as expected. I used a formal email as a channel of communication to the persons concerned. This written communication was good for complex communication because it also attached official documents namely my CV, Business proposal and letter of interest (Light McNaughton, 2014). My first target was a media house and the email targeted its CEO. I used a business proposal to present the idea hoping to add value to the organization, which was struggling financially. The proposal shared the solutions in brief and requested an appointment for further discussions. Using the basic communication approaches, I opted for a communication strategy that involved more than the sender and the receiver. I put into consideration a simplified communication mode that was general and quantifiable. It is advantageous that I used email com munication because it is an effective official mode for external communication. I was able to share bulk information and in a fast, easy and readable format. Although this method was good, it also had challenges because of the broken line of communication (Watzlawick, et al., 2011). According to the organizational rules, all official emails went through the PA who then shared with the CEO. Worst Case Scenario I still do not understand why I got no response from the CEO. Maybe there was a misunderstanding or the email was not clear enough. There is a probability that its content was not catchy though it is not advisable to use graphics and colorful fonts in an official email. I was sure that the organization needed solutions urgently but my approach may have been wrong. The misunderstanding in the written communication could have been in the tone, presentation or timing. Clearly, there are many possible explanations for the failed response. If the email etiquette was right, I may have been inefficient in the communication. Unlike telephone, emails do not always have an immediate response from the receiver. A comprehensive approach would analyze the message, its content, the sender as the source of the message, and the communication link. I was curious to understand the reaction of the receiver since the destination was certain. I wondered why the impact of the communication was negative. An analysis of strategic communication for organization explains the email process, gave me some possible explanations (Downs Allyson, 2012). My email server and the receivers company email decoder encoded the message. The CEO as the decoder of the message may have gotten the wrong impression of the email. What I did not know was that this particular CEO had a personal assistant who interpreted all emails before directing them to the CEO. I could never tell what impression she had because when I called for follow up, she asked me to write another email. As I sent back a follow up email to the CEO, I thought about the circular communication and employee engagement (Welch, 2011). Though I used a two-way plan to communicate with the CEO, the feedback process was not going to be an easy one (Muse, 2013). A follow up in any official communication shows proper etiquette and it serves as a reminder to the CEO. If I failed to get his attention for the first time, a second chance could bear some fruit. Often, managers are busy people. For him to look at my email, it must have important content. Unfortunately, I was not important to the organization, neither was I from a known organization. Cultural hindrances to communication affect email communication because of verbal and nonverbal language cues (Ting-Tooney, 2012). I learnt later that the CEO to the media organization was an expatriate from the US. Even though English is a global language, there are differences between the UK and US versions. Written English is as diverse as the spoken version. In addition, there are emotional barriers and it is difficult to capture the attention of an unknown source. Hindrances to effective communication include the inability to clarify issues. That is why I made a request for an appointment to discuss the issues. An email has limited space for more content and discussion because it is often brief and to the point. Physical barriers imply that the CEO has limited communication from the sender so he can easily brush off the email as insignificant without looking at its content. In order to overcome these barriers, strategies are used. These include solutions suitable for complex and multifaceted communication systems such as large organizations (Scollon, et al., 2011). The solution to language barrier is to ensure clarity in communication. Email has a universal language that provides a standard for the etiquette, structure and content. In order to overcome the psychological barriers, I made sure that the email had an official or professional tone. However, this does not guarantee a positive response from the receiver. Conclusion The worst-case scenario in official communication could happen due to many situations. From the experience, shared, official written communication such as emailing is complex. Often taken for granted emails make a big difference in business interactions. In an attempt to grasp the attention of the CEO in a media house, I found myself in a multilink channel. The PA was involved and the organization servers took part in sending the email. I also used a personal email address to send the information. Although this process is fast and easily accessible, it also possess challenges. A communication cycle is complete when there is a sender and receiver. Although I did not get a response, I shared the information across. It is hard to tell whether my email was unsuccessful due to barriers to communication but there are clues suggesting follow up emails. This explains the multilevel communication approach used in organizational communications.

The Factors that Hamper Democracy in the Middle East Essay Example

The Factors that Hamper Democracy in the Middle East Essay The desire to have nations in the Middle East adopting democratic governance may still be a far cry owing to several reasons that make most of the nations in the region favorably disposed to adopt other kinds of administrative systems other than democracies (William 23). From nation to nation in the region, democratic rule has failed to take root in spite of attempts by Western governments to have it take root there including using force. In sharp contrast, other forms of government have appeared to be more likeable and to take root there more easily than democracy (William 113). Various reasons account for this; and it is about time these reasons are explored so the nations in question can be allowed to follow what seems more likeable and workable for them. This paper critically discusses some of the reasons that hinder democratic rule but favor other forms of governance like monarchies and dictatorships.DiscussionFrom their historical times, a number of nations in the Middle East h ave demonstrated an ability to embrace other forms of governance other than democracies. The following reasons have been responsible for this.Widespread Anti-Western IdeologiesWith the exception of Israel which is a Jewish state, the other nations in the Middle East are Arabic states which seem more inclined to define their own identity and nurture those forms of governance that can be described as endemic there as opposed to adopting and implementing government systems that they consider foreign (William 61). For these nations, the idea of democratic governance is as foreign to them as is any other religion that is not Islam. Therefore, trying to have them adopt democratic rule as has been the trend in the past only serves to strengthen their resolve to oppose Western ideologies typified by democracy and Capitalism. Arabs, by extension, are people who naturally have sense of pride in themselves and what they consider their own. They can go to lengths to preserve their faith in Isla m and can do anything to oppose foreign rule, including supporting regimes that are clearly oppressive. Given this national pride that the people of Middle Eastern nations have, only a system of government that they choose or that is put in place by themselves and not imposed by Westerners will work (William 83).Many examples of this exist. Iraq is still far from the democratic state that the West sought to make it about seven years since the campaigns to end autocratic rule by Saddam Hussein began (Held 7). As it stands, it will be long before democracy takes root there. The human and financial costs, however, will be large if this Western endeavor is to be achieved. The same applies to Afghanistan where the current so-called democratically elected government is on the brink of collapse following renewed opposition from the ousted Taliban militia. What the people are trying to convey is that even though the past regimes might have been dictatorial and cruel, they were better off an d could be tolerated compared to West-imposed rule in the name of democracy. In Iran, the 1970 Revolution that ousted the Shah and brought to power the Ayatollah could have looked as a change for the better in the eyes of some Western governments. However, just like the Shah-led regime was oppressive, the successive regimes have been oppressive as well (Fromm 312). Democratic space in the country is far from the Western dream of democracy. Instead, the people seem to view any acts of Western intervention as a move to advance capitalism further and to frown upon the sovereignty of the people.Arabs are also very tribal people who will readily pledge allegiance to their tribe first before the same can be extended to the nation (Held 33). This has made tribal leaders in these nations to wield a lot of power; and consequently have a lot of say in what happens at national level. In Iraq and Afghanistan, the national war might have been won by the Western Allied Forces but the current insu rgency, which is an even more complicated form of war, cannot be won for as long as this tribal allegiance continues to exist. Tribal cohesion in these nations is the supporting foundation for national government (Fromm 17), but because the West only focused on the need to win the war on a national level, democracy will never be realized until these tribal groupings are first democratized – if that is possible (Held 49).Religion and GovernmentFor many nations in the Middle East, there is a close association of government and religion. As people who are so committed to their religion Islam, Arabs are less prepared to accept a form of government that is not closely associated with their religion. And yet this is exactly what democracy is all about. Democracy in the eyes of the Arabs is viewed as a Western system of government and one which is closely related to, if not perfectly laden with, Christianity (Held 332). As a result, democracy will continue to be opposed in the regio n just in the same manner as Christianity. For the people there, democracy and Christianity are mutually inclusive – none can take root without the other.The War on TerrorThe war on terror is perhaps the current most controversial issue pitting Middle Eastern nations against those from the West (Barber 401). From the point of view of the former, the idea of a global war on terror is actually a war on Islam and Muslims because the suspects so far have been mostly Arabs from all over the world (Barber 56). Although a fairly new development, this war on terror is bound to strengthen the Middle Eastern people’s opposition for the West. Therefore, for as long as the West will be interested in fighting global terrorism the endeavor to promote democracy in the Middle East will increasingly become difficult because to Arabs the war is targeting their people. In fact there is a fast spreading view that this war on terror is actually a move to force Muslims to denounce their fai th by portraying Islam as a bloody religion (Barber 23).Oil WealthFinally, the oil wealth of the region that gives it a prominent position in the world economy makes the Middle East a rather difficult place to introduce democratic rule. Usually, a form of economic deprivation is necessary to have a people of a certain region accepting some changes (William 54). However, since most Arab nations are rich, they do not need anything in exchange for democracy. Being self-supporting and self-sustaining, they will continue to rule themselves as they desire and not as the West desires them to be ruled. For instance, Saudi Arabia, the leading oil exporter of all time, has had a long history of monarchies yet the country is a key Western ally. This is because the country’s economic might shields it from potential Western meddling (William 43).ConclusionGiven these reasons and many others, it will be difficult for democracy to take root in the Middle East. The best way forward would be to allow these nations to adopt their own forms of governance. This stems from the fact that they have ha a long history of self rule and any new forms of government deemed ideal by others might not appeal to them whatsoever.